What Is Objective Morality?

What exactly is objective morality, and is it a meaningful concept? This age-old debate has left philosophers, theologians, and scientists grappling with its implications for centuries. In this article, we will define objective morality, discuss the key arguments for and against it, explore the role of science and philosophy in shaping our understanding of morality, and consider possible areas of consensus. Finally, we will address five frequently asked questions on the topic.

Defining Objective Morality

• The Moral Realism DebateObjective morality falls under the larger philosophical debate of moral realism, which asserts that moral facts and values exist independently of human beliefs and opinions. In contrast, moral anti-realism contends that moral values are entirely constructed by human minds or cultures and have no objective basis.
• Objective vs. Subjective MoralityObjective morality maintains that moral truths exist independently of personal opinions, emotions, or cultural norms. It suggests that some moral principles are universal and apply to everyone, regardless of their beliefs or culture. Subjective morality, on the other hand, posits that moral values are personal or cultural constructs, with no objective basis.

Arguments for Objective Morality

• Moral IntuitionsOne argument in favor of objective morality is that we all possess certain moral intuitions that guide our behavior. For example, most people agree that killing, stealing, and lying are morally wrong. Proponents of objective morality argue that these shared intuitions provide evidence for a universal moral code.
• Moral ProgressAnother argument for objective morality is the idea of moral progress. Throughout history, societies have evolved to adopt more humane practices, such as abolishing slavery and promoting equal rights for all. Advocates of objective morality argue that this progression indicates a movement towards objective moral truths.
• The Moral LandscapeSam Harris, a prominent philosopher and neuroscientist, proposes the idea of a “moral landscape” in which objective moral values can be scientifically determined by measuring human well-being. He contends that moral principles can be grounded in empirical facts about the human experience, leading to an objective basis for morality.

Arguments Against Objective Morality

• Moral RelativismCritics of objective morality often point to moral relativism, which asserts that moral values are determined by cultural norms and personal beliefs. They argue that since different cultures have different moral values, it’s impossible to establish a universal moral code.
• The Problem of EvilThe problem of evil is another argument against objective morality, particularly when it comes to the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent deity. If objective moral values are grounded in divine command, how can we explain the existence of suffering and evil in the world? Critics argue that this inconsistency undermines the concept of objective morality.
• The Euthyphro DilemmaThe Euthyphro Dilemma, originating from Plato’s dialogue, questions whether something is morally good because a deity commands it or whether a deity commands it because it is morally good. This dilemma challenges the idea that objective morality can be grounded in divine command, as either option leads to logical issues.

The Role of Science and Philosophy in Morality

• Utilitarianism and DeontologyTwo influential philosophical theories that attempt to establish objective moral principles are utilitarianism and deontology. Utilitarianism, proposed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, is based on the principle of maximizing overall happiness or well-being. Deontology, developed by Immanuel Kant, emphasizes the importance of adhering to moral duties and rules, regardless of the consequences.
• Virtue EthicsAnother approach to understanding morality is virtue ethics, which focuses on developing good character traits rather than following specific moral rules. Aristotle, a prominent proponent of virtue ethics, argued that living a morally virtuous life leads to human flourishing and well-being, providing a potential objective basis for morality.

Seeking Consensus on Objective Morality

• The Golden RuleThe Golden Rule, which states that we should treat others as we would like to be treated, is a common moral principle found in many cultures and religious traditions. This rule suggests a potential area of consensus on objective morality, as it emphasizes empathy and reciprocity.
• Universal Human RightsThe concept of universal human rights, which asserts that all individuals are entitled to certain basic rights and freedoms, also provides a potential foundation for objective morality. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations in 1948, has gained widespread acceptance as a moral framework for promoting human dignity and well-being.

Conclusion

The debate over objective morality is complex and multifaceted, with compelling arguments on both sides. While some philosophers and scientists argue that objective moral values can be grounded in human well-being or universal principles, others contend that morality is a subjective construct influenced by culture and personal beliefs. Ultimately, the search for common ground, such as the Golden Rule or universal human rights, may provide a more promising path towards understanding and promoting ethical behavior.

FAQs